Friday, 9 August 2013

Salute the Civil Servant

Salutes to you Sir ...



"District collector, U.
Sagayam of Madurai, Tamil
Nadu - By refusing to take
bribes, the Madurai collector
has earned 18 transfers in 20

years, a modest house and
bank balance and lots of
respect"
Three years ago, as district
collector of Namakkal, Tamil
Nadu, U. Sagayam voluntarily
declared his assets: a bank
balance of Rs 7,172 and a
house in Madurai worth Rs 9
lakh. Once, when his baby
daughter, Yalini, who had
breathing problems, was
suddenly taken ill, he did not
have the Rs 5,000 needed for
admitting her to a private
hospital. At that time he was
deputy commissioner (excise)
in Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu,
and there were 650 liquor
licences to be given out. The
going bribe for each was
rumoured to be Rs 10,000.
(He needs a special mention
here because the assets of
an IAS officer-couple in
Madhya Pradesh were valued
at Rs 360 crore. They had 25
flats in three cities)
'Reject bribes, hold your
head high', says a board
hanging above Sagayam’s
chair in his modest office.
That’s the code he lives by,
even if politicians are
incensed they cannot bend
him their way—he’s been
transferred 18 times in the
last 20 years—and has made
enemies of both superiors
and subordinates. “I know I
sit under a dangerous slogan
and probably alienate
people,” he says. “But I have
been the same Sagayam
from Day 1. Standing up
against corruption is not for
a season. Nor is it a fad. It’s
forever”, he says.
On a hot summer afternoon,
on Madurai’s busy main
road, the district collector,
U. Sagayam, saw a young
man talking on a cellphone
while riding a motorbike. He
asked his driver to wave the
man down, got down from
his car and meted out
instant punishment: plant 10
saplings within 24 hours.
Somewhat unconventional
justice, some might say. But
that’s how Sagayam works.
He also took on a mighty
soft-drink mnc when a
consumer showed him a
bottle with dirt floating in it.
He sealed the bottling unit
and banned the sale of the
soft drink in the city. In
Chennai, he locked horns
with a restaurant chain and
recovered four acres valued
at some Rs 200 crore.
Sagayam’s masters degrees
in social work and law come
in useful in his role as an
administrator. He knows the
rulebooks in detail and is not
afraid of using them,
however powerful the
opponent. No wonder then
that Sagayam’s career is
marked with the scars of
countless battles.
Sagayam’s wife Vimala has
stood by him all these years
but she was rattled by some
of the threats during the
elections. “He always says if
you are right, nobody can
hurt you,” she says. “But
sometimes it becomes
difficult.”
Sagayam says he learnt
honesty on his mother’s
knees.


Thursday, 8 August 2013

Poverty experience- Not a story, this is what really happened.

Late last year, two young men decided to live a month of their lives on the income of an average poor Indian. One of them, Tushar, the son of a police officer in Haryana, studied at the University of Pennsylvania and worked for three years as an investment banker in the US and Singapore. The other, Matt, migrated as a teenager to the States with his parents, and studied in MIT. Both decided at different points to return to India, joined the UID Project in Bengaluru, came to share a flat, and became close friends.

The idea suddenly struck them one day. Both had returned to India in the vague hope that they could be of use to their country. But they knew the people of this land so little. Tushar suggested one evening,"Let us try to understand an average Indian, by living on an average income". His friend Matt was immediately captured by the idea. They began a journey which would change them forever.

To begin with, what was the average income of an Indian? They calculated that India's Mean National Income was Rs. 4,500 a month, or Rs. 150 a day. Globally people spend about a third of their incomes on rent. Excluding rent, they decided to spend Rs. 100 each a day. They realized that this did not make them poor, only average. Seventy-five per cent Indians live on less than this average.

The young men moved into the tiny apartment of their domestic help, much to her bemusement. What changed for them was that they spent a large part of their day planning and organizing their food. Eating out was out of the question; even dhabas were too expensive. Milk and yoghurt were expensive and therefore used sparingly, meat was out of bounds, as were processed food like bread. No ghee or butter, only a little refined oil. Both are passionate cooks with healthy appetites. They found soy nuggets a wonder food affordable and high on proteins, and worked on many recipes. Parle G biscuits again were cheap: 25 paise for 27 calories! They innovated a dessert of fried banana on biscuits. It was their treat each day.

Restricted life

Living on Rs.100 made the circle of their life much smaller. They found that they could not afford to travel by bus more than five km in a day. If they needed to go further, they could only walk. They could afford electricity only five or six hours a day, therefore sparingly used lights and fans. They needed also to charge their mobiles and computers. One Lifebuoy soap cut into two. They passed by shops, gazing at things they could not buy. They could not afford the movies, and hoped they would not fall ill.

However, the bigger challenge remained. Could they live on Rs. 32, the official poverty line, which had become controversial after India's Planning Commission informed the Supreme Court that this was the poverty line for cities (for villages it was even lower, at Rs. 26 per person per day)?

Harrowing experience

For this, they decided to go to Matt's ancestral village Karucachal in Kerala, and live on Rs. 26. They ate parboiled rice, a tuber and banana and drank black tea: a balanced diet was impossible on the Rs. 18 a day which their briefly adopted poverty' permitted. They found themselves thinking of food the whole day. They walked long distances, and saved money even on soap to wash their clothes. They could not afford communication, by mobile and internet. It would have been a disaster if they fell ill. For the two 26-year-olds, the experience of official poverty' was harrowing.

Yet, when their experiment ended with Deepavali, they wrote to their friends: Wish we could tell you that we are happy to have our normal' lives back. Wish we could say that our sumptuous celebratory feast two nights ago was as satisfying as we had been hoping for throughout our experiment. It probably was one of the best meals we've ever had, packed with massive amounts of love from our hosts. However, each bite was a sad reminder of the harsh reality that there are 400 million people in our country for whom such a meal will remain a dream for quite some time. That we can move on to our comfortable life, but they remain in the battlefield of survival a life of tough choices and tall constraints. A life where freedom means little and hunger is plenty...

Plenty of questions

It disturbs us to spend money on most of the things that we now consider excesses. Do we really need that hair product or that branded cologne? Is dining out at expensive restaurants necessary for a happy weekend? At a larger level, do we deserve all the riches we have around us? Is it just plain luck that we were born into circumstances that allowed us to build a life of comfort? What makes the other half any less deserving of many of these material possessions, (which many of us consider essential) or, more importantly, tools for self-development (education) or self-preservation (healthcare)?

We don't know the answers to these questions. But we do know the feeling of guilt that is with us now. Guilt that is compounded by the love and generosity we got from people who live on the other side, despite their tough lives. We may have treated them as strangers all our lives, but they surely didn't treat us as that way...

So what did these two friends learn from their brief encounter with poverty? That hunger can make you angry. That a food law which guarantees adequate nutrition to all is essential. That poverty does not allow you to realise even modest dreams. And above all in Matt's words that empathy is essential for democracy.